0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.12	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 04:09:09 EDT 2024
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.35	This is a THF_ problem
0.12/0.36	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.12/0.36	Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lriQTg347b/E---3.1_25396.p -m 16384 -t 180
0.21/0.38	% (25526)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/183Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25527)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/4Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25529)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25528)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/27Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25530)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25531)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/275Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25532)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_25396 for (1799ds/18Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Instruction limit reached!
0.21/0.38	% (25529)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Instruction limit reached!
0.21/0.38	% (25530)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Termination reason: Unknown
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Termination phase: Saturation
0.21/0.38	
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.21/0.38	% (25530)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.21/0.38	% (25530)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (25530)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Termination reason: Unknown
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Termination phase: Saturation
0.21/0.38	
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.21/0.38	% (25529)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.21/0.38	% (25529)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (25529)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Instruction limit reached!
0.21/0.39	% (25527)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Termination reason: Unknown
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Termination phase: Saturation
0.21/0.39	
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
0.21/0.39	% (25527)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.21/0.39	% (25527)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25527)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25528)First to succeed.
0.21/0.39	% (25531)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.21/0.39	% (25526)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.21/0.39	% (25528)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.21/0.39	% SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_25396
0.21/0.39	% SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_25396
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_0, type, cD: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_1, type, cF: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_2, type, cS: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_4, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_7, type, sK0: $i > $i).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_8, type, sK1: $i > $i).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_10, type, sK3: $i > $i).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_11, type, sK4: $i > $i).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_12, type, sK5: $i > $i > $i).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_13, type, sK6: $i > $i > $i).
0.21/0.39	thf(f36,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  $false),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f33])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f33,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true != $true)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f18,f32])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f32,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (cD @ (sK6 @ (sK3 @ (sK1 @ X0)) @ X1) @ (sK0 @ sK2) @ X0))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f31])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f31,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ($true = (cD @ (sK6 @ (sK3 @ (sK1 @ X0)) @ X1) @ (sK0 @ sK2) @ X0))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f29,f22])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f22,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (cF @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f16,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X0] : ($true = (cF @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) & ! [X2] : ! [X4,X5] : (! [X6,X7] : (($true = (cD @ X6 @ X7 @ X2)) | ($true != (cF @ X5 @ X7)) | ($true != (cF @ X4 @ X6))) | ($true != (cD @ X4 @ X5 @ (sK1 @ X2)))) & ! [X9] : ! [X11] : (($true = (cD @ X11 @ sK2 @ X9)) | ($true != (cS @ (sK3 @ X9) @ X11))) & ! [X12] : ! [X14] : ((($true = (cF @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12) @ (sK6 @ X14 @ X12))) & ($true != (cD @ (sK6 @ X14 @ X12) @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f8,f15,f14,f13,f12,f11,f10,f9])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f9,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X0] : (? [X1] : ($true = (cF @ X0 @ X1)) => ($true = (cF @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f10,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X2] : (? [X3] : ! [X4,X5] : (! [X6,X7] : (($true = (cD @ X6 @ X7 @ X2)) | ($true != (cF @ X5 @ X7)) | ($true != (cF @ X4 @ X6))) | ($true != (cD @ X4 @ X5 @ X3))) => ! [X5,X4] : (! [X6,X7] : (($true = (cD @ X6 @ X7 @ X2)) | ($true != (cF @ X5 @ X7)) | ($true != (cF @ X4 @ X6))) | ($true != (cD @ X4 @ X5 @ (sK1 @ X2)))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f11,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ? [X8] : ! [X9] : ? [X10] : ! [X11] : (($true = (cD @ X11 @ X8 @ X9)) | ($true != (cS @ X10 @ X11))) => ! [X9] : ? [X10] : ! [X11] : (($true = (cD @ X11 @ sK2 @ X9)) | ($true != (cS @ X10 @ X11)))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f12,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X9] : (? [X10] : ! [X11] : (($true = (cD @ X11 @ sK2 @ X9)) | ($true != (cS @ X10 @ X11))) => ! [X11] : (($true = (cD @ X11 @ sK2 @ X9)) | ($true != (cS @ (sK3 @ X9) @ X11))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f13,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X12] : (? [X13] : ! [X14] : ? [X15] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ X13))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15))) => ! [X14] : ? [X15] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f14,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X12,X14] : (? [X15] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15))) => (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12) @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12)))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f15,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X12,X14] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12) @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))) => (($true = (cF @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12) @ (sK6 @ X14 @ X12))) & ($true != (cD @ (sK6 @ X14 @ X12) @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f8,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X0] : ? [X1] : ($true = (cF @ X0 @ X1)) & ! [X2] : ? [X3] : ! [X4,X5] : (! [X6,X7] : (($true = (cD @ X6 @ X7 @ X2)) | ($true != (cF @ X5 @ X7)) | ($true != (cF @ X4 @ X6))) | ($true != (cD @ X4 @ X5 @ X3))) & ? [X8] : ! [X9] : ? [X10] : ! [X11] : (($true = (cD @ X11 @ X8 @ X9)) | ($true != (cS @ X10 @ X11))) & ! [X12] : ? [X13] : ! [X14] : ? [X15] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ X13))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f7,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X10] : ? [X11] : ($true = (cF @ X10 @ X11)) & ! [X4] : ? [X5] : ! [X7,X6] : (! [X8,X9] : (($true = (cD @ X8 @ X9 @ X4)) | ($true != (cF @ X6 @ X9)) | ($true != (cF @ X7 @ X8))) | ($true != (cD @ X7 @ X6 @ X5))) & ? [X0] : ! [X1] : ? [X2] : ! [X3] : (($true = (cD @ X3 @ X0 @ X1)) | ((cS @ X2 @ X3) != $true)) & ! [X12] : ? [X13] : ! [X14] : ? [X15] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ X13))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f6,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X12] : ? [X13] : ! [X14] : ? [X15] : (? [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) & ($true != (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ X13))) & ($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15))) & (! [X4] : ? [X5] : ! [X7,X6] : (! [X9,X8] : (($true = (cD @ X8 @ X9 @ X4)) | (($true != (cF @ X7 @ X8)) | ($true != (cF @ X6 @ X9)))) | ($true != (cD @ X7 @ X6 @ X5))) & ? [X0] : ! [X1] : ? [X2] : ! [X3] : (($true = (cD @ X3 @ X0 @ X1)) | ((cS @ X2 @ X3) != $true)) & ! [X10] : ? [X11] : ($true = (cF @ X10 @ X11)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f5,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ~((! [X4] : ? [X5] : ! [X7,X6] : (($true = (cD @ X7 @ X6 @ X5)) => ! [X9,X8] : ((($true = (cF @ X7 @ X8)) & ($true = (cF @ X6 @ X9))) => ($true = (cD @ X8 @ X9 @ X4)))) & ? [X0] : ! [X1] : ? [X2] : ! [X3] : (((cS @ X2 @ X3) = $true) => ($true = (cD @ X3 @ X0 @ X1))) & ! [X10] : ? [X11] : ($true = (cF @ X10 @ X11))) => ? [X12] : ! [X13] : ? [X14] : ! [X15] : (($true = (cS @ X14 @ X15)) => ! [X16] : (($true = (cF @ X15 @ X16)) => ($true = (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ X13)))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f4,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ~((? [X0] : ! [X1] : ? [X2] : ! [X3] : ((cS @ X2 @ X3) => (cD @ X3 @ X0 @ X1)) & ! [X4] : ? [X5] : ! [X6,X7] : ((cD @ X7 @ X6 @ X5) => ! [X8,X9] : (((cF @ X7 @ X8) & (cF @ X6 @ X9)) => (cD @ X8 @ X9 @ X4))) & ! [X10] : ? [X11] : (cF @ X10 @ X11)) => ? [X12] : ! [X13] : ? [X14] : ! [X15] : ((cS @ X14 @ X15) => ! [X16] : ((cF @ X15 @ X16) => (cD @ X16 @ X12 @ X13))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
0.21/0.39	  ~((? [X5] : ! [X1] : ? [X9] : ! [X3] : ((cS @ X9 @ X3) => (cD @ X3 @ X5 @ X1)) & ! [X1] : ? [X6] : ! [X8,X7] : ((cD @ X7 @ X8 @ X6) => ! [X0,X4] : (((cF @ X7 @ X0) & (cF @ X8 @ X4)) => (cD @ X0 @ X4 @ X1))) & ! [X5] : ? [X0] : (cF @ X5 @ X0)) => ? [X0] : ! [X1] : ? [X2] : ! [X3] : ((cS @ X2 @ X3) => ! [X4] : ((cF @ X3 @ X4) => (cD @ X4 @ X0 @ X1))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f1,conjecture,(
0.21/0.39	  (? [X5] : ! [X1] : ? [X9] : ! [X3] : ((cS @ X9 @ X3) => (cD @ X3 @ X5 @ X1)) & ! [X1] : ? [X6] : ! [X8,X7] : ((cD @ X7 @ X8 @ X6) => ! [X0,X4] : (((cF @ X7 @ X0) & (cF @ X8 @ X4)) => (cD @ X0 @ X4 @ X1))) & ! [X5] : ? [X0] : (cF @ X5 @ X0)) => ? [X0] : ! [X1] : ? [X2] : ! [X3] : ((cS @ X2 @ X3) => ! [X4] : ((cF @ X3 @ X4) => (cD @ X4 @ X0 @ X1)))),
0.21/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lriQTg347b/E---3.1_25396.p',cX2138)).
0.21/0.39	thf(f29,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cF @ sK2 @ X2)) | ((cD @ (sK6 @ (sK3 @ (sK1 @ X0)) @ X1) @ X2 @ X0) = $true)) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f27])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f27,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cF @ sK2 @ X2)) | ($true != $true) | ((cD @ (sK6 @ (sK3 @ (sK1 @ X0)) @ X1) @ X2 @ X0) = $true)) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f26,f19])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f19,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X14 : $i,X12 : $i] : (($true = (cF @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12) @ (sK6 @ X14 @ X12)))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f26,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cF @ (sK5 @ (sK3 @ (sK1 @ X0)) @ X1) @ X3)) | ($true != (cF @ sK2 @ X2)) | ($true = (cD @ X3 @ X2 @ X0))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f25])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f25,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cF @ sK2 @ X2)) | ($true = (cD @ X3 @ X2 @ X0)) | ($true != (cF @ (sK5 @ (sK3 @ (sK1 @ X0)) @ X1) @ X3)) | ($true != $true)) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f21,f24])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f24,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (cD @ (sK5 @ (sK3 @ X0) @ X1) @ sK2 @ X0))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f23])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f23,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (cD @ (sK5 @ (sK3 @ X0) @ X1) @ sK2 @ X0)) | ($true != $true)) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f20,f17])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f17,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X14 : $i,X12 : $i] : (($true = (cS @ X14 @ (sK5 @ X14 @ X12)))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f20,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X11 : $i,X9 : $i] : (($true != (cS @ (sK3 @ X9) @ X11)) | ($true = (cD @ X11 @ sK2 @ X9))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f21,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X6 : $i,X7 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (($true != (cD @ X4 @ X5 @ (sK1 @ X2))) | ($true != (cF @ X5 @ X7)) | ($true = (cD @ X6 @ X7 @ X2)) | ($true != (cF @ X4 @ X6))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f18,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X14 : $i,X12 : $i] : (($true != (cD @ (sK6 @ X14 @ X12) @ X12 @ (sK4 @ X12)))) )),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	% SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_25396
0.21/0.39	% (25528)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25528)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.21/0.39	% (25528)Termination reason: Refutation
0.21/0.39	
0.21/0.39	% (25528)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.21/0.39	% (25528)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
0.21/0.39	% (25528)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
0.21/0.39	% (25528)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25528)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (25525)Success in time 0.014 s
0.21/0.39	EOF